Threats to Parks
National parks are even more overcrowded
than wilderness areas. All of the problems plaguing urban areas are
found in popular national parks during peak, seasonal use, including
crime, vandalism, litter, traffic jams, and pollution of the soil,
water, and air. Many people think that more funding is needed to
maintain and repair existing parks and that; in addition, new parks
should be created to meet current and projected demands.
Some national parks have imbalances in
wildlife populations. For example, in the 1920s wolves were
exterminated in Yellowstone National Park because of their threat to
herbivorous mammals such as elk. As a result, the elk population at
Yellowstone has increased to the point where today it is endangering
many plant species upon which it feeds. A similar elk problem exists at
the Rocky Mountain National Park, where wolves have been absent since
the turn of the century. Because national parks are supposed to
preserve natural ecosystems, much conservation thinks that wolves
should be reintroduced at Yellowstone and Rocky Mountain national parks.
Additional examples of wildlife imbalances
on national park lands involve declining populations of many other types
of mammals, including bears, white-tailed jackrabbits, and red foxes
(see Chapter 1). For example, the number of grizzly bears in national
parks in the western United States has greatly diminished. Grizzly bears
require large areas of wilderness undisturbed by humans. Clearly,
human influences in national parks are a
factor in their decline. More important, the parks may be too small to
support grizzlies. Fortunately, grizzly bears have survived in
sustainable numbers in Alaska and Canada.
National Parks are
also affected by human activities beyond their borders. Pollution
doesn't respect park boundaries. Also, parks are increasingly becoming
islands of natural habitat surrounded by human development. Development
on the borders of national parks limits the area in which wildlife may
range, forcing wildlife into isolated populations. Ecologists have
found that, when environmental stresses occur, several small "island"
populations are more likely to become threatened than a single large
population occupying a sizable range.