|
|
Home
> Environment
> Our Changing
Environment >
THE GOALS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
THE GOALS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Unlike biology, geology,
chemistry, and physics— sciences that seek to establish general
principles about how the natural world functions— environmental science
is, by its very nature, an applied science, a form of problem
solving: it is the search for constructive alternatives to
environmental damage. The science of ecology, a discipline of biology
that studies the interrelationships between living organisms and their
environment, is the basic tool of environmental science, and so we begin
our study with a detailed treatment of ecology. Using what we have
learned about ecology, we
|
The Reuseable Shipping Crate To reduce
solid waste, industries are turning to reuseable packaging- The
trend got its first major push in 1989 when General Motors declared
it would no longer accept disposable packaging at its automobile
plants. The result was the development of rugged steel and plastic
containers that make dozens of round trips before being recycled.
The most popular of these new-breed containers are large plastic
crates with built-in pallet grooves that allow a fork lift to move
them around just like wooden pallets. The plastic crates collapse
to about one-third their erected size for return trips. They pay for
themselves through |
|
The Earth Summit
In June 1992,
representative from around the world met in Rio de Janeiro. Brazil, for
a summit conference officially called the United Nation Conference on
Environment and Development. Countries attending the conference
examined environmental problems that cross international borders
problems that are truly global in nature: pollution and deterioration of
the planet's atmosphere and oceans; destruction of forests; and a
decline n the number and kinds of living organisms. It is easy for the
representatives of a country to say that that country supports a cleaner
environment but the actual specifies what is going to be done, how soon,
how much its going to costs and who’s going to pay are very difficult to
agree upon. The issue were discussed and debated at 1992 Earth summit
included. Climate change: A treaty that would curb carbon dioxide
emission, thereby reducing the green house effect. Although no timetable
was agreed upon, the treaty at least starts the process of stabilizing
carbon dioxide emissions. Biological Diversity: A treaty that would
decrease the rate of extinction of the world’s endangered species.
Deforestation: A statement of principle regarding the destruction of the
world’s forest. Agenda 21: A complex action plan for the 21st
century in which developed nations would provide money to help
developing countries become industrialized without harming the
environment. Earth Charter (the Rio Declaration):
A statement of philosophy about environment and development.
The statement of
principles on deforestation was originally to have been a legally
binding treaty that would stop developing nations from burning tropical
forests. Developing countries objected that the treaty unfairly focused
and did not address the logging of old-growth forests in the United
States, Canada, and Europe. When a compromise could not be reached, the
treaty was scrapped for a weaker statement that is not legally binding.
The pre summit negotiations for the remaining topics were equally
complex. In general the poorer developing nations felt that their top
priority had to be economic survival rather than saving the environment.
They express the willingness to follow the environmental mandates of
industrialized countries, but if only these countries contributed money
to help them protect the environment. Industrialized nations, for their
part, acknowledged that they had some responsibilities toward developing
nations but also stressed that the current rapid population growth and
industrialization of developing nations threatens to do more
environmental damage than was done by developed countries when they were
becoming industrialized. Thus, developed countries want developing
countries to focus on slowing their rates of population growth and
industrialization in order to preserve environment.
Although the
Earth summit did not accomplish all that environmentalists had hopped it
would, it was a resounding success in many ways. It was largest
international gathering ever to concentrate on serious environmental
issues, and, because it received so much international attention, it
increased worldwide awareness of global issues. Also the earth summit
demonstrated just how far apart developed and developing nations stand
on many issues. This awareness will be needed in future negotiation of
international environmental issues.
then directly
address human population growth and three of the major results of that
growth: increasing need for energy, depletion of resources, and rising
pollution. Many of the environmental problems we consider in this hook
are serious ones that must he addressed—if not by us, then unavoidably
by our children.
Environmental
science is not, however, simply a “doom and gloom” listening of problems
coupled with predictions of a bleak future. To the country it focuses,
and our focus as individuals and as world citizen, is on identifying,
understanding and solving problems that we and our ancestors have
created. A great deal is being done, and more must be done—at
individual, country, and worldwide levels—to address the problems of
today's world. Most environmental issues are complex, however, and
cannot be solved by science alone because they interact with numerous
competing interests and goals (see Meeting the Challenge: The Earth
Summit). We fill a considerable amount of space in this text examining
some successful approaches to environmental problems and exploring
other problems that defy easy solutions.
|